Legal Opinion

State v. Sears

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1996No. 23049PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLECKLEY, Justice:

The defendant below and appellant herein, Frederick Sears, Jr., was sentenced following a guilty plea to wanton endangerment involving a firearm. He now appeals the sentence entered against him. The defendant asserts the circuit court violated double jeopardy principles by applying the parole eligibility requirements of W.Va.Code, 62-12-13(a)(1)(A) (1988), when sentencing under the wanton endangerment involving a firearm statute contained in W.Va.Code, 61-7-12 (1994). Because the circuit court impermissi-bly enhanced the defendant’s parole eligibility requirements, we remand…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. JamesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. EastonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. GreeneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Appleby v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API