State v. James
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McHUGH, Justice:
The pending matter involves three eases consolidated for purposes of appeal 1 to address challenges to the constitutionality of West Virginia Code § 62-12-26 (2009), providing for a period of extended supervision following release from incarceration for certain sex offenders. While the particular arguments of the appellants vary, the collective basis for challenging the statute as facially unconstitutional on both federal and state grounds is that the statutory provisions constitute cruel and unusual punishment, violate due process rights, and serve to subject a person to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- State of West Virgina v. Gabriel Hargus, etc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- State of West Virginia v. Jerry DeelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- State of West Virginia v. James Scott YocumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- State of W.Va. ex rel. Biafore v. Earl Ray TomblinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- State of West Virginia v. Patrick Shawn CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.