Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 29, 1992No. CV 92-3120-WJR (JGx)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

REA, District Judge.

This action came on for hearing September’ 28, 1992, before the Court, the Honorable William J. Rea presiding, on Plaintiff Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company’s Motion to Transfer Venue, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. After full consideration of the authorities submitted by the parties and oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby denies Plaintiffs motion.

I. BACKGROUND

This action was filed by Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (“Goodyear”), seeking a declaratory judgment that McDonnell Douglas Corporation’s (“MDC”) settlement of claims…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Marksman Partners, L.P. v. Chantal Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
  2. Vu v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  3. Hawkins v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
  4. Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
  5. Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API