Legal Opinion

Vu v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 9, 2009No. C 08-5717 SIPublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

Defendant Costco filed a motion to transfer venue to the Central District of California. Plaintiffs subsequently moved to remand this case to state court. The motions are scheduled for hearing at 9:00am on March 13, 2009. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and hereby VACATES the hearing. Having considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby DENIES plaintiffs’ motion to remand and GRANTS…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  2. Hawkins v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
  3. Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Byler v. Deluxe Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
  5. Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API