Legal Opinion

Adam v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2011No. 54121PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

At his trial for trafficking in a controlled substance, appellant Ramon Dinkha Adam sought a jury instruction on the procuring agent defense, which generally provides that if a defendant is an agent of the purchaser, then the defendant should only be held as culpable as the purchaser. The district court rejected the instruction, even though there was some evidence, and Nevada caselaw, that supported giving the instruction. In this appeal, we revisit that prior precedent holding that the procuring agent defense is applicable to a charge of trafficking in a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rupert Ex Rel. Rupert v. StienneNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Miller v. BurkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. Wyatt v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. SierraNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Armenta-Carpio v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Estate of Sarge v. Quality Loan Serv. Corp. (In re Estate of Sarge)Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  3. WHITFIELD VS. NEV. STATE PERS. COMM'NNevada Supreme Court · 2021
  4. IN RE: ESTATE OF SARGENevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. IN RE: ESTATE OF SARGENevada Supreme Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API