People v. Sierra
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Cooke, J.
We reiterate here that which has been stated before, although not without some controversy, and that which should be readily apparent from legal as well as logical analyses— that the existence of an agency relationship furnishes no defense upon a charge for the mere criminal possession. of a controlled substance, knowingly and unlawfully possessed.1
This proposition obtains regardless of whether the charged possession involves a minimum separate quantity or aggregate amount of such a substance or substances (see *59Penal Law, §§ 220.03, 220.06, subds 2, 3; §§ 220.09,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. ReismanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. ArgibayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. TiradoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- In re Jahron S.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.