Legal Opinion

Castillo v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 11, 2024No. 3:24-cv-01017Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARTURO MARCELINO CASTILLO, Case No.: 24-cv-1017-BTM-DEB BOOKING #92864-298, 12 ORDER: Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO 14 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, 15 JOHN DOES 1-300 and USA, (2) DISMISSING DOE 16 Defendants. DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO 28

17 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b), and 18 19 (3) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO EFFECT SERVICE OF COMPLAINT 20 AND SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT 21 USA PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) & Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 22 23 24 Plaintiff Arturo Marcelino Castillo, an inmate at the Federal…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API