Legal Opinion

Kansas City Life Insurance v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 21, 1928No. 12,081PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

As the beneficiary in a life insurance policy, issued by the defendant company on the life of James W. Marshall, plaintiff’s husband, the jury’s verdict was for the plaintiff in the sum of $932.57, on which judgment was rendered and the defendant is here with its writ of error.

In the opening of its brief defendant says that the case presents the question as to whether the beneficiary of a life insurance policy may recover thereon, in what is commonly called a “disappearance case,” when the policy has expired because of the nonpayment of premiums a few months less than five years after such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. Bradley v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Goodier v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. New York Life Insurance v. HolckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. New York Life Ins. v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Arnall v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Ballinger v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API