Legal Opinion

Fahrenwald v. LaBonte

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1982No. 13829PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This case focuses upon a sublease of commercial real property. We are asked to decide whether the sublessee is entitled to recover damages resulting from the sublessor’s allegedly unreasonable withholding of consent to an assignment of the sublease to another tenant. The district judge denied recovery because he was not persuaded that the sublessor had acted unreasonably. We affirm.

I

From a rather convoluted record, we have distilled the following facts essential to our opinion. In 1977 Lloyd LaBonte and Errol Beach acquired the “going concern” value of an automobile dealership…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Robinson v. WeitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Broad & Branford Place Corp. v. J. J. Hockenjos Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  3. Funk v. FunkIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ringwood Assocs. Ltd. v. Jack's of Route 23, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. Perry Plumbing Co. v. SchulerIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nani Koolau Co. v. K & M Construction, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Sherry v. SherryIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Safeway Inc. v. CESC PLAZA LID. PARTNERSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  4. Salazar v. TilleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Lupis v. Peoples Mortgage Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API