Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hughes v. PeaceHealth

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2008No. CC 16-02-18544; CA A123782; SC S053447Published

1DissentWalters, J.

The right of trial by jury “occupies so firm a place in our history and jurisprudence!,]” Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 US 474, 486, 55 S Ct 296, 79 L Ed 603 (1935), that it can be said to define our system of justice. So central is the right to jury trial that this court should not retreat from principles it has *173recognized as essential to the preservation of that right without doing so directly and with clear justification. Because the majority has so retreated, I must dissent.

Since 1927 the court has consistently held that the right to jury trial is “not to be narrowly construed and is not limited…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Greist v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API