Legal Opinion

Chauche v. Pare

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 1896No. 264PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. This was an action at law by A. S. Pare against Marie E. Chauche, executrix, and others, for alleged infringement of a patent. In the circuit court a verdict was given for plaintiff. To review the judgment entered thereon, defendants sued out this writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error were the defendants in an action brought to recover damages for the infringement of letters patent issued on June 3,1884, to Dominique Lille, for an improvement in fruit presses. On May 22, 1885, the patentee, wTho resided in France, executed to Aime Pare, of Fresno, Cal., a power of attorney, with authority and upon terms therein expressed to grant licenses to manufacture and sell machines containing the invention for and during the life of the patent, also authority to transfer and assign said patent, “but at prices, charges, clauses, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Johnson Railroad Signal Co. v. Union Switch & Signal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Johnson Railroad Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
  4. Machesney v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co. v. LemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API