Machesney v. Brown
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
In Equity. Bill to restrain the infringement of letters patent for an invention. Plea allowed, with costs, and leave granted to complainant to move to amend his bill. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.
The bill in this case is to restrain the infringement of letters patent for an invention, granted to one Sweet, and the plea, which has been set down for argument, avers that the only title of the complainant to the invention is one derived by an instrument executed. and delivered to the complainant by one Smith, ¿which is set out in full in the plea. This instrument in its first clause describes Ira E. Smith as party of the first part. The second clause recites that Smith, by power of attorney from Sweet, became the attorney of Sweet for the purpose of selling and assigning the patent. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Elwell v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
- Kiersted v. . O. and A.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Fullam v. Inhabitants of West BrookfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1864
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson Railroad Signal Co. v. Union Switch & Signal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1893
- Toledo Computing Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Chauche v. PareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896