Legal Opinion
Aaron v. Scott
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 21, 2006No. 46A03-0504-CV-180PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
Jim Aaron appeals the trial court's orders granting Susan J. Mahl's motion to quash (the March 22, 2005 order) and denying his motion for rule to show cause (the March 29, 2005 order), and presents the following restated issues on appeal:(1) Did the trial court err when it concluded it did not have the power to compel the return of property to Indiana?(2) Did the trial court err when it quashed the writ of execution?(3) Did the trial court err when it concluded Merrill Lynch was not in contempt?
We affirm.
The underlying facts were set out by this court in a previous…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First Bank of Whiting v. Samocki Bros. Trucking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Harlan Bakeries, Inc. v. MuncyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Flash v. HoltsclawIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Porter Development, LLC v. First National Bank of ValparaisoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aaron v. MahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Aaron v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2007
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- C.M. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jim Aaron v. Susan MahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.