Legal Opinion

Stuart Reed and Michael Reed v. Michael Cassady

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2015No. 49A05-1405-PL-220PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Judge.

[1] Stuart Reed and Michael Reed (the “Reeds”) appeal the trial court’s order on April 22, 2014, related to certain discovery sanctions and contempt for failure to pay other previously-ordered sanctions. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[2] On July 10, 2012, Michael Cassady filed a Verified Complaint for Damages and for Declaratory and Permanent In-junctive Relief against Stuart Reed, Michael Reed, Distinctive Transportation Services, Inc. (“DTS”), Specialty Transpor tation, LLC (“Specialty”), and Executive Coach, LLC (collectively, the “Defendants”). Cassady alleged that he…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Ex Parte ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. City of Gary v. MajorIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of: Thomas Todd Reynolds v. Tricia ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Johnson v. Hix Wrecker Serv., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Antonio Buford v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Bobby J. Johnson, Jr. v. Hix Wrecker Service, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Charles Huffer v. Chelsy Huffer (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API