Hinkle v. Wayne County Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This appeal arises from postjudgment proceedings in a dispute over a partial refund owed by a hospital that was overpaid for the care of plaintiffs decedent, Marilyn J. Hinkle-Calcutt.
We hold that MCR 2.614(A)(1), commonly described as the automatic stay provision, does not apply to voluntary payments in satisfaction of a judgment. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals to the extent that it holds to the contrary.
i
While the plaintiffs decedent was a patient at Harper-Grace Hospital, two insurance companies made duplicate payments for her care. Harper-Grace was prepared to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Veenstra v. Washtenaw Country ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Grievance Administrator v. UnderwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Contempt of CalcuttMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hinkle v. Wayne County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. Hawkins; People v. ScherfMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Maskery v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Glen Lake-Crystal River Watershed Riparians v. Glen Lake Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re Estate of MoukalledMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.