Legal Opinion
MAG Aerospace Industries, Inc. v. B/E Aerospace, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 23, 2016No. 2015-1370, 2015-1426PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
These appeals concern vacuum toilets, such as those that are commonly found on commercial aircrafts. Plaintiff-Appellant MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC (“MAG”) sued B/E Aerospace (“B/E”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,536,054 (“'054 patent”), 6,536,055 (“'055 patent”), and 6,353,942 (“'942 patent”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The district court granted summary judgment of nonin-fringement on all • patents, from which MAG timely appeals. The district court also ruled that the doctrine,. of assignor estoppel barred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Diamond Scientific Co. v. Ambico, Inc. And Clarence Joseph WelterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Shamrock Technologies, Inc. v. Medical Sterilization, Inc., and Robert S. LuniewskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Pandrol USA, LP v. Airboss Railway Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Eve-Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Sri Int'l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Enplas Display Device Corpora v. Seoul Semiconductor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.