Legal Opinion
Pandrol USA, LP v. Airboss Railway Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 19, 2005No. 2004-1069PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri granted summary judgment to Pandrol USA, LP and Pandrol Ltd. (Pandrol) because Airboss Railway Products, Inc., Airboss of America Corp., Robert M. Magnuson, and Jose R. Mediavilla (Airboss) did not produce clear and convincing evidence that U.S. Patent No. 5,110,046 (the `046 patent) is invalid. Pandrol USA, LP v. Airboss Ry. Prods., Inc., No. 99-0182-CV-W-SOW (W.D.Mo. Oct. 15, 2003) (Opinion). The district court determined that no reasonable juror could find that the `046 patent fails to satisfy the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Baldwin Graphic Systems, Inc. v. Siebert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- MAG Aerospace Industries, Inc. v. B/E Aerospace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.