Legal Opinion
Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 1, 2013No. 2011-1619, 2011-1620, 2011-1635, 2011-1639PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
PROST, Circuit Judge.
This patent infringement case involves a combination ophthalmic drug treatment. The issues on appeal are invalidity and claim construction. Sandoz Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Alcon Research Ltd., Alcon, Inc., and Falcon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (collectively, “Sandoz”) challenge the district court’s finding that the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,642,258 (“'258 patent”); 7,320,976 (“'976 patent”); 7,323,463 (“'463 patent”); and 7,030,149 (“'149…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Winner International Royalty Corporation v. Ching-Rong WangCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Twi Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Stryker Corporation v. Zimmer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Allergan Sales, LLC v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.