Stryker Corporation v. Zimmer, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc., — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 1923, 195 L.Ed.2d 278 (2016). In the original appeal, Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Surgical, Inc., and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products (collectively “Zimmer”) appealed from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan that U.S. Patent Nos. 6,022,329 (“’329 patent”), 6,179,807 (“’807 patent”), and 7,144,383 (“’383 patent”) were valid and willfully infringed.
We affirmed the jury’s findings that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Barry v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017
- Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v. Techtronic Indus. Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Dana-Farber Cancer Inst., Inc. v. Ono Pharm. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Abiomed, Inc. v. Maquet Cardiovascular LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- AQUAPAW BRANDS LLC v. FLO PETDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.