Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. (In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 3, 2005No. 17-12785PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION ON JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

JUDITH H. WIZMUR, Bankruptcy Judge.

The defendants jointly move to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety because it is time-barred under section 1144, because it violates the order of confirmation, because it is barred by the doctrines of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel, and because it fails to assert a claim for fraud with specificity as required by Rule 9(b). I conclude that plaintiffs’ complaint as against the debtor is barred by operation of section 1144 and the order of confirmation, and must therefore be dismissed. Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Yamaha Corporation of America v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haskell v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. (In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
  2. Johnson v. Stemple (In Re Stemple)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  3. In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
  4. Haskell v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. (In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2007
  5. In re Apex Long Term Acute Care Katy, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API