State ex rel. Padgett v. Foulkes
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Knox Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
It has long been settled that where an amended complaint is filed the original no longer remains as a pleading, and that rulings upon it are made immaterial by the amendment. The record in this case shows that the ruling on the motion to strike out applied solely to the original complaint, and as that was superseded by amendment, that ruling becomes wholly immaterial. The only ruling in the case, therefore, which is properly before us. is that upon the demurrer to the information, and to that we dii’ect our attention.
The information is one in a proceeding in the nature of a quo warranto, and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Reynolds v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Jackson School Township v. FarlowIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Engleman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Racer v. State ex rel. RhineIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Carolina-Tennessee Power Co. v. Hiawassee River Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.