Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Melton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1936No. 26553PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This action was commenced in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county by defendant in error, hereinafter' referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover salary due him as municipal judge.

The facts in the case are virtually undisputed. Plaintiff was appointed to the office in question on May 3, 1932, by action of the mayor and board of commissioners of the defendant city, and served in that capacity for approximately two years. By informal agreement between. plaintiff; and some or all of the commissioners, his salary was placed at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Board of Com'rs of Grant CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Board of Com'rs of Washita County v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Ticer v. State Ex Rel. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Rackley v. City of PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Board of Com'rs of Hughes County v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Terre Haute Gas Corporation v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Jones v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Landers v. Board of Education of Town of Hot SpringsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Opinion No. 70-274 (1970) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API