Ticer v. State Ex Rel. Holt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County;' G. C. Abernathy, Judge. Action by the State on relation of C. P. Holt, County Attorney, against N. A. J. Ticer. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The following specifications of error are made by the counsel for plaintiff in error: (1) Were the county commissioners, prior to the going into the effect of the act of May 29, 1908 (Sess. Laws 1907-08, pp. 217, 218), entitled to compensation of $1.50 per day as overseers of the poor? (2) Were they entitled to reimbursement of moneys expended by them when engaged in work directed by the board, and for purposes for which the parties to whom the moneys were paid were entitled to pay from the county?
1. Sections 3645 and 3663, St. Okla. 1893, are as follows:
“3645. The county commissioners of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bliss v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Allen v. Comm'rs of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- State Ex Rel. West v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Kirkwood v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. Board of Com'rs of Grant CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Board of Com'rs, Cleveland Co. v. BarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Kirk v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, MUSKOGEE CTY.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Dorsett v. State Ex Rel. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Orendorff v. Board of Com'rs of Grant CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.