Legal Opinion
Friedberg v. Santa Cruz
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, sue the defendants for damages for personal injuries and loss of services alleged to have resulted from an accident in which the plaintiff Mary Friedberg was injured as a result of the negligence of the defendant Adriana Santa Cruz in the management and operation of an automobile owned by her husband, the defendant Hernon Santa Cruz. Said defendants, appearing generally, have interposed their verified answer in which they join issue on the merits in respect of the material allegations of the causes of action alleged by each of the plaintiffs. By an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Muslusky v. . Lehigh Valley Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Braman v. BramanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Citizens Trust Co. v. R. Prescott & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- McClure Newspaper Syndicate v. Times Printing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Friedberg v. Santa CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949