Legal Opinion

Sokol v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 23, 2015No. 11-772CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C. § 204; Physical Evaluation Board; Board for the Correction of Naval Records; Arbitrary and Capricious Standard; Fitness for Naval Service; SECNAVINST 1850.4E § 3405; 10 U.S.C. § 1201; 32 C.F.R. §§ 723.2, 723.6; 5 U.S.C. § 552a; Credibility Determinations

OPINION AND ORDER

KAPLAN, Judge.

Plaintiff Daniel Sokol is a former member of the United States Navy (“Navy”). He has filed this action under the Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C. § 204 (2012), alleging that he was wrongfully discharged without referral to the Physical Evaluation Board (“PEB”) for certain allegedly…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Metz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Bader v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  3. Dillard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  4. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  5. McPherson v. SpencerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API