Legal Opinion

Martin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 11, 2025No. 16-1221Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-1221C Filed: January 30, 2025 Reissued for Publication: February 11, 20251 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ANTONIO MARTIN, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * Michael D.J. Eisenberg, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Daniel Falknor, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant. With him were Douglas K. Mickle, Assistant Director, Patricia M. McCarthy, Director, and Brett A. Shumate, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division. Maj. Nicole A.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API