Legal Opinion
Metz v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 18, 2006No. 2005-5158PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims finding that Kevin J. Metz’s separation from the United States Air Force was involuntary and granting his motion for judgment upon the administrative record. Metz v. United States, 61 Fed.Cl. 154 (Fed.Cl.2004). Because Metz failed to assert that his separation was involuntary before the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (“AFBCMR” or “Board”), he is foreclosed from relying on the Military Pay Act’s, 37 U.S.C. § 204, money-mandating status as a basis for his Tucker Act, 28…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Colonel David W. Palmer, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Augustin S. James v. Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army and Philip J. SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Textron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Walls v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Peoples v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.