Legal Opinion
McDaniel v. City of Beaumont
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 6, 1936No. 2885PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Chief Justice.
C. H. and Howard McDaniel, appellants, were plaintiffs below, and appellee, city of Beaumont, was defendant. By their petition, appellants undertook to plead a cause of action for “extra costs” incurred by them in the erection of a high school building for defendant under the following contract:
“This agreement, made this 27th day of November, A. D. Nineteen Hundred and Twenty-Eight between McDaniel Brothers Contractors, a partnership composed of C. H. & Howard McDaniel, of Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, party of the first part, and the City of Beaumont, Municipal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
- Moore v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Totten v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Kettler Brass Manufacturing Co. v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- McElwrath v. City of McGregorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Emerald Forest Utility District v. Simonsen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Martin Bros. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940