Legal Opinion

Emerald Forest Utility District v. Simonsen Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 19, 1984No. C14-83-828CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.

A predecessor to the rights of appellant hired Irving L. Peabody Engineers, Inc. to design an underground sewer system. Appellant contracted with appellee to construct the line according to Peabody’s plans and specifications. The line failed soon after its completion and Appellant sued both Peabody and Appellee. The evidence showed that after appellee began construction, it encountered very wet sand conditions. There was testimony that an alternate wet sand construction method should have been used. The jury found that the line failed because the design provided…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. v. Brookhollow, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Tower Contracting Company v. FloresTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Board of Regents of the University of Texas v. S & G Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Butler v. Joseph's Wine Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dallas County Medical Society v. Ubiñas-Brache, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  2. Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Chapman & Cole v. Itel Container International B.V.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board v. INET Airport Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  5. Great American Insurance Co. v. North Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API