Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mayle v. Felix

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 2005No. 04-563PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

545 U.S. 644 (2005)

MAYLE, WARDEN

v.

FELIX.

No. 04-563.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 19, 2005.

Decided June 23, 2005.

Mathew Chan, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Manuel M. Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Janet E. Neeley and Ward A. Campbell, Supervising Deputy Attorneys General.

Lisa S. Blatt argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With her on…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Ginsburg; Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Alfred Copeland v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. (HC) Augustine v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (HC) Griffin v. MartinezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (HC) Hernandez v. MerlakDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (HC) Hicks v. BurtonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API