(HC) Hicks v. Burton
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLIFTON ROBERT HICKS, No. 2:18-cv-2237 JAM DB P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROBERT BURTON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Presently before the court is respondent’s 19 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) and petitioner’s filing in response (ECF No. 18). For the reasons 20 set forth below, the court will direct petitioner to indicate how he would like to proceed with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Peter M. Gatlin v. M.K. Madding, Warden Attorney General of the State of California People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Campbell v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Anthony Butler v. David LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.