Legal Opinion
Joseph H. Reinfeld, Inc. v. Schieffelin & Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 6, 1983PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
CLIFFORD, J.
The Director of the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (Director and ABC) determined that Schieffelin & Co., a liquor importer, violated N.J.S.A. 33:1-93.6, which prohibits discrimination in the sale of most nationally advertised liquors by importers to authorized wholesalers. In addition to challenging that determination, appellants claim that N.J.S.A. 33:1-93.6 deprives them of due process and equal protection and mandates a group boycott in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1. We uphold the Director’s finding of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brown v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- R & R Marketing, L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Matter of CVS Pharmacy WayneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Ideal Dairy Farms, Inc. v. Farmland Dairy Farms, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- State v. SciosciaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.