Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 24, 1975No. 75-12PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

A jury returned a verdict awarding damages to the plaintiff in the amount of $15,000 in an action to recover for personal injuries. Plaintiff consented to a remittitur of $7,500, reducing the judgment to $7,500. The trial court then denied defendant’s post-trial motion for a new trial. Plaintiff appeals, contending that the original verdict was proper and that she is not precluded from raising the issue on appeal because she consented to the remittitur.

Supreme Court Rule 366(b)(2) (ii) (Ill. Rev. Stat 1973, ch. 110A, par.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Malleable Castings Co. v. Iroquois Steel & Iron Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Knowles Foundry & Machine Co. v. National Plate Glass Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  3. Baker v. Spaulding Women's Apparel, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haid v. TingleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Diaz v. Legat Architects, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Congregation of the Passion, Holy Cross Province v. Touche Ross & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Carter v. KirkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Bender v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API