Legal Opinion

Zegar v. Sears Roebuck and Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 28, 1991No. 1-90-1055PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn

Plaintiff, Marion Zegar, on her own behalf and as alleged class representative of others similarly situated, filed this action against defendants, Sears Roebuck & Company (Sears) and Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). Zegar seeks to compel Allstate, Sears’ insurer, to pay medical expense benefits directly to those persons injured on the premises of Sears stores. Zegar relies on certain language in the policy of insurance that she claims authorizes third-party claimants to directly sue the insurer (Allstate) without first receiving a judgment or settlement from the insured (Sears).

Sears is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scroggins v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Marchlik v. Coronet InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Richardson v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Gianinni v. BluthartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Loeber Motors, Inc. v. SimsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. In the Matter of Gladys E. Shondel, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Deborah Amling v. Harrow Industries, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. Fernstrom Storage and Van Company v. Fernstrom Storage and Van CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Harper v. Wausau InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API