Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1985No. 60929PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

Defendant, Economy Fire and Casualty Company (Economy), was permitted, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308(a) (87 Ill. 2d R. 308(a)), to take an interlocutory appeal from an order entered by the circuit court of Rock Island County denying its motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint. The appellate court affirmed (126 Ill. App. 3d 520), and we allowed Economy’s petition for leave to appeal (94 Ill. 2d R. 315(a)). Four issues are presented for our review, the primary one being whether plaintiffs’ amended complaint constitutes a direct action against an insurance carrier for personal…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hammond v. North American Asbestos Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Babcock v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Sullivan v. Midlothian Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Marchlik v. Coronet InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Urtz v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Gladys E. Shondel, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Fernstrom Storage and Van Company v. Fernstrom Storage and Van CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Paul Benjamin West v. The Western Casualty and Surety Company, a Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Richter v. Prairie Farms DairyIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Taylor v. City of BeardstownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API