Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Porter

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 18, 1942PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

The complainant, George Mitchell, doing’ business as Memphis Welding* Company, filed this bill against Dr. A. R. Porter, seeking a new trial of a case at law wherein judgment had been rendered against him in favor of the defendant in the bill. Generally stated, the ground was that the judgment had been rendered at a time and under such circumstances as that through no fault of his own the complainant had been deprived of an opportunity to file a motion for a new trial and preserve the evidence heard in the case at law by bill of exceptions and hence he had been precluded from seeking relief…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Ledgerwood v. PittsTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Dunn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Carney and Mai v. CookTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Carpenter v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Waller v. SkeletonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  2. Crane Enamel Co. v. JamisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Thomas v. DockeryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  4. Allison v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  5. Darty v. DartyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API