Vitromar Piece Dye Works v. Lawrence of London, Ltd.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtTeapp, P. J.
Upon trial before the court on a complaint and counterclaim concerning a contract for processing material, the court entered judgments for the defendant as to the complaint and for the plaintiff-counterdefendant upon defendant’s counterclaim. Plaintiff appeals.
The record brought to this court contains only the pleadings, the judgment of the trial court and the recorded comments of the trial court on entering judgment.
The complaint alleged that by written contract, plaintiff agreed to waterproof 13,789% yards of material furnished by defendant to plaintiff for a price of 32 cents per yard, or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nash v. WeidenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Bond Electric Corp. v. Gold Seal Electrical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Bond Electric Corp. v. Gold Seal Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Hunter v. FinnertyNew York Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mieske v. Bartell Drug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- J & R Electric Division of J. O. Mory Stores, Inc. v. Skoog Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Osterholt v. St. Charles Drilling Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1980
- Puritan Manufacturing, Inc. v. Klayman & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Philadelphia v. Hertz Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.