Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Finnerty

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Action on a promissory note for $350. Answer that plaintiff sold defendants an automobile for $350 with a warranty that it was good and usable, for which they executed the note in suit, and that the automobile was worthless. Defendants counterclaimed for $219 expended in repairs to the automobile to make it usable. Plaintiff contradicted defendants’ story.

The evidence shows that defendants did not reject the car and never actually rescinded the contract to purchase the same. This being so they had the remedies provided for a breach of the warranty, viz., to recoup in diminution or extinction…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vitromar Piece Dye Works v. Lawrence of London, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  2. Vitromar Piece Dye Works v. Lawrence of London, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API