Legal Opinion

United States v. Marks

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 3, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

Demurrer to criminal information, charging in count 1 that defendant did, on the 20th day of November, 1923, unlawfully possess certain aigrettes taken from the egret, or heron, in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of July 3,1918 (Comp. St. Anm Supp. 1919, §§ 8837a-8837m), count 2, that she did sell or offer same for sale. The demurrer challenges the information, because it does not allege when or how these aigrettes came into defendant’s possession and specifically does not allege that they were taken since the passage of the act.

The government does not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Fuld Store Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1920
  2. United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1919
  3. United States v. SamplesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1919
  4. United States v. SelkirkDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Gerald L. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. BlanketDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
  4. United States v. AllardDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1975
  5. United States v. Roger Paul HamelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API