Legal Opinion

United States v. Thompson

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided June 4, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Criminal prosecution by the United States against E. D. Thompson. On demurrer to information.

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

The issue in this cause, raised by demurrer to an information filed by the United States attorney, charging the defendant with a violation of the Migratory Bird Act of July 3, 1918 (40 Stab. 755, c. 128, U. S. Comp. St. 1918, p. 1795), entitled: “An act to give effect to the convention between the United States and Great Britain for the protection of migratory birds, concluded at Washington, August 16, 1916, and for other purposés” (the treaty referred to will be found in 39 Stat. 1702), is whether the act is constitutional.' This, of course, involves the power make…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Pan American Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  2. United States v. MarksDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1925
  3. United States v. SelkirkDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API