United States v. Fuld Store Co.
District Court, D. Montana
Information by the United States against the Fuld Store Company.
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
The information (and exhibits of it a part) charges (1) that before the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of July 3, 1918 (40 Stat. 755 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 8837a-8837j]), defendant owned and possessed aigrettes of heron plumage, and continued to own and possess them months thereafter; and (2) that months after said act defendant offered said aigrettes for sale. Defendant, without counsel and by one of its officers, answered the charge is true, and that it would “leave it to the court.” A plea of guilty was tentatively entered. It is believed, however, that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Doe v. BradenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Eberle v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Gerald L. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- In re Informations under Migratory Bird Treaty ActDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1922
- United States v. BlanketDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- United States v. AllardDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.