Legal Opinion
Kirsch Holding Co. v. Borough of Manasquan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 12, 1952PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 N.J. Super. 91 (1952)
93 A.2d 582
KIRSCH HOLDING COMPANY, A BODY CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND IRVING B. KIRSCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF MANASQUAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 3, 1952.
Decided December 12, 1952.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, GOLDMANN and FRANCIS.
Mr. William R. Blair, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Parsons, Labrecque, Canzona & Combs, attorneys).
Mr. Robert V. Carton argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Durand, Ivins & Carton,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Edwards v. Mayor, Etc. of Borough of MoonachieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Fred v. Mayor and Council, Old Tappan BoroughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. Mundet Cork Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Zullo v. Board of Health, Woodbridge Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- American Grocery Co. v. Board of Commissioners of New BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Lead Paint LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Brindley v. Borough of LavalletteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Cammarata v. ESSEX COUNTY PARK COMMN.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Champlain Valley Exposition, Inc. v. Village of Essex JunctionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Markey v. City of BayonneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.