Legal Opinion

State v. Dillihay

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 27, 1992PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

In this case, as in State v. Brana, 127 N.J. 64, 601 A.2d 1160 (1992), also decided today, we consider the validity of the anti-merger provision of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7, which prohibits distribution of controlled dangerous substances within a school zone, as applied to a defendant who committed first- and second-degree violations of N.J.S.A. 2C:35-5, the provision of New Jersey’s Controlled Dangerous Substances Act (the Act) that generally prohibits the manufacturing, distribution, or dispensing of controlled dangerous substances.

Violations of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. VasquezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. State v. SchubertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  3. State v. DiazSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. State v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. State v. RomeroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API