Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 21, 2007PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA

Defendant, Christopher Romero, was convicted of first-degree robbery and related offenses in connection with the mugging of Carmine Cavaliere. Identification was the pivotal issue in the case. Defendant, who is Hispanic, claimed that the victim, a Caucasian, misidentified him. Because of the importance of the identification testimony and the dearth of corroborating evidence to supplement the reliability of that identification, defendant asked the trial court to instruct the jury with a cross-racial identification charge tailored to address this “cross-ethnic” identification. See State v.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  3. State v. Byseem T. Coles (070653)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  4. State v. Sanchez-MedinaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  5. State v. ChenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API