State v. Maldonado
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
Defendants in these two eases challenge the constitutionality of that portion of the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act of 1986 (the Act) that imposes strict criminal liability on manufacturers and distributors of certain controlled dangerous substances (CDS) when death results from the ingestion of the CDSs. N.J.S.A. 2C:35-9. A defendant convicted of distribution or manufacturing is subject to second or third-degree punishment, but if a person dies from ingestion of those CDSs then the defendant is guilty of a first-degree offense. Conviction under the drug death statute requires only that but…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Hamilton Amusement Center v. VernieroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- McNeely v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.