Legal Opinion
Corning Gilbert Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 1, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-15; Court 11-00511PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Judge:
This action arises from a decision by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) to exclude certain of Plaintiffs merchandise from entry into the commerce of the United 'States. Customs refused entry to Plaintiffs merchandise based on a General Exclusion Order (the “650 GEO”) issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) jn Investigation No. 337-TA-650 (the “650 Investigation”). The 650 GEO prohibits unlicensed entry of coaxial cable connectors that infringe claim 1 and/or claim 2 of U.S. Patent 6,558,194 (the “'194 Patent”). Plaintiff Corning Gilbert Inc.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Otter Products, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- One World Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications RF, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
- Wirtgen Am., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Wirtgen America, Inc. v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020