Schnakenberg v. Schnakenberg
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.
These are motions to dismiss the complaint as insufficient in law.
The material facts admitted for the purpose of these motions may be summarized as follows: In September, 1938, Henry A. Schnakenberg died leaving him surviving as his only next of kin his widow, the plaintiff herein, and his sister, Charlotte Schnakenberg. On June 22, 1939, the decedent’s last will and testament, dated July 7, 1926, was admitted to probate by the Surrogate’s Court of Kings County. The will made no provision for the plaintiff, but bequeathed more than half of the estate to a charitable institution. The defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Murray v. Brooklyn Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Murray v. Brooklyn Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1939