Legal Opinion

Murray v. Brooklyn Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 1, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

The seven plaintiffs are the designated beneficiaries of seven separate savings bank accounts, aggregating $13,411.76, in the form commonly known as “ Totten trusts ” (Matter of Totten, 179 N. Y. 112), created for their benefit at various times by Lawrence J. O’Neill subsequent to his marriage on November 11, 1934, to the defendant Mary Margaret O’Neill. Lawrence J. O’Neill died intestate on April 11, 1938. His widow was appointed the administratrix of his estate. The account in each instance is in the name of the deceased “ in trust for ” the designated beneficiary. In addition to the funds…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Robb v. . Washington Jefferson CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Von Hesse v. . MacKayeNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Bodner v. FeitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of MundNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
  2. In re the Estate of LaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  3. Succession of ShadrickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Schnakenberg v. SchnakenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Hochster v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API