Legal Opinion

Murray v. Brooklyn Savings Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenman, J.

The deceased, Lawrence J. O’Neill, at the age of fifty-five, married Mary Margaret O’Neill, twenty-nine, on November 11, 1934. Their marriage was not entirely a happy one, but they lived together until April 11, 1938. On that day the deceased died, intestate. The deceased had threatened to leave his wife on several occasions, and had also declared that he would leave her nothing when he died.

The decedent left him surviving no mother, father or children. His widow, two sisters and a number of nephews and nieces alone are entitled to share in his intestate estate of which the widow is the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Mabie v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Schluter v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Murray v. Brooklyn Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. In re the Estate of BartholdNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. In re the Estate of ShortleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  4. Krause v. KrauseNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Schnakenberg v. SchnakenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API