Legal Opinion

Howard v. Higgins

California Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1902No. S.F. No. 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This action is upon a promissory note and a mortgage to secure it, both made by defendant Higgins to plaintiffs. The prayer is for the usual judgment in such a case. The answer set up that the consideration of the note was, that plaintiffs were to build a house, which they had not done, and that plaintiffs were to execute and deliver to Higgins a deed of conveyance of the mortgaged premises free of all liens, etc., except the mortgage sued on, and that they had refused to give such deed, although requested to do so. It appears from the evidence that the plaintiffs were, and still are, the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tucker v. ThravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Armstrong v. Maryland Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Hart v. Kanawha Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Gray v. SoutherneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API